Friday, May 24, 2019

Engineering Ethics Violated and Upheld In the Fukushima Disaster Essay

locomotive engineering moral philosophy Violated and Upheld In the Fukushima Disaster trigger On March 11, 2011 an earthquake took place in Tohuku District, in Japan. The earthquake triggered a massive tsunami that resulted to an outbreak of a nuclear forcefulness plant in Japan. The tsunami was about 14- metres in height and it struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, that is located in Okuma and Futaba tons in the Fukushima Prefecture (Japan-earthquake, 2013). This ca utilise the loss of great power to the reactor that had units of 1, 2 and 3. Additionally, the outbreak caused adversity of the cooling system and an explosion of hydrogen that caused a massive destruction of the entire nuclear plant. The damages came along with extensive release of radioactive reactors into Japanese atmosphere and the entire demesne. Great damages certainly happened to Japan and its dwellers. There atomic military issue 18 many theories regarding this accident, but the happening was m ajorly caused by either man-made disaster or a natural disaster (Ho, 2011). The implications of this disaster were tremendous in aspects of ecology, sociology, health and social hazards. The main goal of this research is to establish engineering ethical code that were violated or upheld during the establishment of a nuclear plant. The paper will begin with definitions of engineering ethics, then, the research will establish the ethics that engineers violated during reflexion of the nuclear plant which later turned to be a disaster in Japan.Definition Engineering ethics is a system of moral principles and bowl of applied ethics that argon applied to the field and practice of engineering. Engineering ethics seeks to examine and set obligations for engineers to the society, customers and to the engineering profession. This discipline is closely related to some some other subjects such as ethics of technology, philosophy of engineering and philosophy of science.Responsibility of engineers The code of ethics recognizes an engineer as a person who should work and copy his or her profession with the greatest merit while committing his self interest to serving the community and pursuing the welfare and progress of the majority in the community. By changing the nature to benefit mankind, an engineer must be able to increase his or her awareness of the globe as the home of a man. Engineers interests to the universe should guarantee him power to overcome his spirit, skills and knowledge of reality to transform the earth into a fairer and happier place. An engineer should reject form of action that has a motive of causing general harm to the society so to prevent potential threats or hazards to the environment, health, life and the rights of human beings. Therefore, engineers are required to uphold the prestigiousness of the engineering profession, ensure it is properly discharged and maintain a professional demeanour based on his or her ability, fortitude, ho nesty, modesty, justice, magnanimity and temperance. These values should be upheld with proper consciousness of personal eudaemonia and subordinated to the social good. An engineer should ensure that he acquires new skills, more in the engineering field and the same time mobilize his knowledge, share his or her experience and provide opportunities for training and education for his employees, provide credit, moral and material hold up to the college or university where he or she studied, therefore, go the benefits and chances he and his bosses have received. An engineer should execute his duties with efficiency, that is, he must ensure compliance of standards required by law. This knowledge is very important in grounds where things neer worked in Fukushima nuclear power plant. The research majorly focused with the ethics behind setting a nuclear plants and presentation are as follows.honorable concerns for nuclear power plant As saying goes, great power comes with responsibi lity. This saying can be applied to a nuclear form of skill because of its additional power, but also to its volatile nature. Radioactive material is very hard to store and, therefore, presents a potential threat to the public health. The nuclear materials are also associated with the most powerful human weapons in the world. As an engineer contracted to set a nuclear plant, there are a number of controversial concerns that an engineer must address in order to uphold engineering ethics. Ethical issues that engineers could have addressed while setting Fukushima nuclear power plant include ramification of the location of the area that he plant was placed, this involved looking at the affects the plant could have to the sight of Japan wellbeing and the people could have reacted to the idea of the plant. Global health safety is another concern that the engineers could have addressed (The Ethics behind a Nuclear Phase-out and Replacement, 2014).Ethics involved in safety of nuclear reac tors The health and safety of nuclear reactors are the first consideration that engineers should have addressed during construction of Fukushima nuclear power plant. According to the National Society of professional engineers code of ethics, all engineers are expected to uphold the safety, welfare and health of the community. For instance, during construction, engineer should have used runny sodium rather than water because sodium is much safe than versions of water. The engineers violated this code of ethics because the explosion of the Fukushima nuclear plant caused relocation of over 130000 people while 1,600 people were left dead (Bird, 2013). New times reported that more people around the place of incident were forced to relocate to other places much far from the area of accident due to radioactive materials that were released to the atmosphere. Japanese were quoted saying that, this time we have nobody to blame for the mess that just occurred, we are responsible for the pol luted environment around us. (Bird, 2013).Public opinion ethics and global consequences Fukushima nuclear power plant was against this code of ethics. The attitude of setting nuclear plant near public dwelling places was totally unethical. The results of the explosion were negative many people were evacuated as others lost their lives. Therefore, according to this research, the public opinion ethics was not considered well by the engineers before setting the power plant at Fukushima a place that is surrounded by towns full of people. The engineers also never considered the safety of Japans and worlds environment. The radioactive materials released to the environment forced the government to relocate citizens who were living in the nearby towns.Conclusion The filling Japan needs to consider as discussed in the paper the downfalls of the nuclear power production in Japan should serve as major limited review test of Japans principle source of energy. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) code of ethics should be used to decide which source of energy Japan should take full advantage of (Code of Ethics, 2013). For instance, Japan should set a massive sea-based wind power off the coastal region of Fukushima and become independent of using nuclear energy that proved to be hazardous. Taking advantage of wave energy could be another radical of making Japan free of nuclear source of energy. This because the wave source of energy is beneficial and does not violate the ASCES and NSPEs codes of ethics. This research, therefore, support and suggests the performance of wind and wave power farms in Japan so as to make the country independent of nuclear powers caused great damage to the countrys dwellers and its environment.ReferencesE. Ho. (2011, March 16). Reactor Redux Whats happening at Fukushima-Daiichi? TIME. (Online article).http//newsfeed.time.com/2011/03/16/reactor-redux-whats-happening-at-fukushim a-daiichi/(2013). Code of Ethics. ASCE. (Online).http//www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html (2013, September 20). Japan Earthquake Tsunami Fast Facts. CNN. (Onlinearticle).http//www.cnn.com/2013/07/17/world/asia/japan-earthquaketsunami-fast-factsThe Ethics behind a Nuclear Phase out and Replacement. (2014, March 04). Retrieved May 20, 2014, from my future as a professional Engineer http//www.pitt.edu/jtz9/MyFuture.htmlW. Bird. (2013, March 10). deuce years on, Fukushima evacuees seek justice and a normal life. The Japan Times. (Online article).http//www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2013/03/10/people/two-years-on-fukushima-evacuees-seek-justice-and-a-normal-life/.Um7nXZR4Z9BSource document

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.